Why would a bunch of IQ-obsessed eugenist billionaires back Trump, a bankrupt idiot? Because he's a great distraction. Possibly the best distraction in the history of distractions.
Here’s something we can actually measure that you dullards have tied your colours to. So if America doesn’t suffer massive inflation and trade imbalances are corrected, if outsourcing slows or is even reversed, if there isn’t a massive lasting downturn and mass unemployment as predicted by all “experts” and instead trade deal are made that are preferential to Americas interest and Americas economic outlook, you will all eat your words right? You’ll convert to protectionist principles immediately.
You could link to some evidence of your claims. You’ve the technical ability. If they are “eugenics” followers I and others will be interested and maybe swayed to your argument but without it’s just baseless slander. Good article though.
Hmm. Slander relates to veracity, not to the presence of citation. I would also point out that there are twenty six other direct sources ... and I'm not sure I can link every word ... and, there is google :shrugs: ... but here you are ... here's a good starter-for-ten:
"It reveals how Ton-That, who obsessed over race, IQ, and hierarchy, solicited input from eugenicists and right-wing extremists while building Clearview" -- which comes from the MotherJones article cited in my piece.
In fact, my link is even to the specific paragraph of the MJ article? (In Chrome at least - not sure how much browser support there is for the #:~:text= protocol thingie)
Here’s something we can actually measure that you dullards have tied your colours to. So if America doesn’t suffer massive inflation and trade imbalances are corrected, if outsourcing slows or is even reversed, if there isn’t a massive lasting downturn and mass unemployment as predicted by all “experts” and instead trade deal are made that are preferential to Americas interest and Americas economic outlook, you will all eat your words right? You’ll convert to protectionist principles immediately.
You could link to some evidence of your claims. You’ve the technical ability. If they are “eugenics” followers I and others will be interested and maybe swayed to your argument but without it’s just baseless slander. Good article though.
Hmm. Slander relates to veracity, not to the presence of citation. I would also point out that there are twenty six other direct sources ... and I'm not sure I can link every word ... and, there is google :shrugs: ... but here you are ... here's a good starter-for-ten:
https://bylinetimes.com/2025/04/04/how-nazi-race-science-conquered-the-white-house-and-is-coming-for-your-democracy/
... also, there is already a reference?
"It reveals how Ton-That, who obsessed over race, IQ, and hierarchy, solicited input from eugenicists and right-wing extremists while building Clearview" -- which comes from the MotherJones article cited in my piece.
In fact, my link is even to the specific paragraph of the MJ article? (In Chrome at least - not sure how much browser support there is for the #:~:text= protocol thingie)
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/04/clearview-ai-immigration-ice-fbi-surveillance-facial-recognition-hoan-ton-that-hal-lambert-trump/#:~:text=It%20reveals%20how,an%20authoritarian%20takeover.